Jere Longman (PS) hates Lolo Jones.

The stunner Jones, who could indeed make others envious just like PS Jere Longman

Here we another one of those articles explaining patiently why left wing cretins should really be associated more with pond scum than being regarded as rational, thinking human beings. The PS (pond scum), are convinced that endless bitching about anything they do not agree with will eventually secure them the opportunity to make the senile and ludicrous changes they demand. Remember also ofcourse that the plethora of delusional LW/PS are still of the opinion that they can change the automatic function firmly ensconced in the DNA. Such is their arrogance and brazen stupidity. They just still don't get it.

Over the past fifty years they have tried every which way to turn both males and females into versions of each other, they prefer the adrogenous look. One where there is no identifiable difference between the sexes, good luck with that as it demands that every single female has surgey at birth or plastic surgery to ensure such duplication. I don't think that the girls will be too happy at having their boobs removed, just becuase the lunatic left are being perpetually offended. That offence mechanism has obviously no limitations either.

Mr. Longman has gone long on trying to turn Lolo Jones into a man.  I’m not his psychiatrist, but to me, that sounds like it merits a few sessions.
Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical A-Team.

This PS Jere Longman would be one of those drones and here, he is clearly demonstrated as such.

Undressing Jere Longman -- the NYTimes writer who hates pretty athletes

Two days before her Olympic race, Jere Longman, a New York Times sportswriter, wrote a column that criticized Lolo Jones, a beautiful, female hurdler who also happens to have overcome spinal surgery and hamstring injuries to remain among the top runners in the world. Jones placed fourth in the 100-meter hurdles on Tuesday.
Longman eviscerated Jones for posing for a naked photograph (in which her private parts are not visible) and in a sexy bathing suit on the cover of Outdoor magazine, claiming she was out for notoriety at any cost, even if it meant playing “vixen” or “virgin.”  Jones is a Christian and a virgin, by the way.
Longman’s column, however, may say more about him—and those hostile to all trappings of true gender identity—than about Jones.  His call to shroud feminine athletes and deny the fact that some do, indeed, achieve fame based on their looks, not purely their athletic prowess, is a distant cousin of those movements in the world that seem to fear the sexual power of women and cover them head-to-foot, as well as those cultural movements that assert there ought to be no difference between men and women.
Mr. Longman objecting to a beautiful athlete posing in sensual photographs, while remaining silent about female boxers who look androgenous, beating up one another in a boxing ring, until they fall down, is worth noting.  

Jamaica's Usain Bolt crosses the finish line to win Gold.

How good is this guy ? Wow!!

Usain Bolt creates Olympic history by winning the men's 200m final

• AAP
• August 10, 2012 5:30AM

 

Watch

Usain Bolt does the double by winning the 200m final

Usain Bolt does the sprinting double by claiming the 200m title, while Australia's K4-1000 kayaking team claim a shock gold medal and Aussi...

Play

 

 

Every picture tells a story: Jamaica's Usain Bolt defends his Olympic title as he crosses the line ahead of fellow countryman Yohan Blake in the men's 200m final. Source: AP

USAIN Bolt is officially a legend.

The fastest man on the planet achieved that goal by defending his 200m Olympic title in typically incredible fashion, narrowly missing his own Olympic record by clocking 19.32sec.

It was a Jamaican trifecta, with his training partner Yohan Blake second in 19.44sec and youngster Warren Weir taking the bronze in a personal best of 19.84sec.

Bolt had the race cooked after the first 50m and from lane seven he was metres in front at the top of the straight.

Blake did close late but he was never a threat with the world record holder looking over at his friend and putting one finger to his lips as he crossed the line.

Jamaica's Usain Bolt crosses the finish line to win the gold medal in the men's 200-meter final during the athletics in the Olympic Park during the 2012 Summer Olympics, Thursday, Aug. 9, 2012, in London. (AP Photo/Mark Baker) Source: AP

While everyone else in the world is already calling him a legend, Bolt wouldn't until he replicated his effort in Beijing of winning the 100m/200m double in London.

His winning time equalled Michael Johnson from Atlanta in 1996 and was just .02sec off the Olympic record which he set four years ago.    

Bolt had thought he might challenge his world mark of 19.19sec but the reality was all he was after was gold and legendary status in his own mind.
Bolt said: "This is the one I wanted and I got it."

The Olympics beginning to Suck ever more...

I use to enjoy the Olympics back a few years ago, when it was a combination of amateur athletes and politics was nowhere to be seen except ofcourse when those lunatics from communist countries got involved. They saw no issue with dragging children from the arms of their parents and drugging their population, forcing them into training regimes that you would not put an animal through, let alone a human being. But as with all those communist countries, the metal count was somehow a deciding factor on how superior their countries are or were, most have disappeared thank goodness. The East Germans were one of the worst, where we witnessed a former athlete stating that her life was completely destroyed by the drugs they forced down her throat in order to insure a dishonest win. This was before the drug tests arrived as that was becoming a major problem as well,

Peter Hitchens has a few things to say and I agree with some. Apart from the fact that the Olympics is now about greed, self promotion, selfishness, logos and advertising rights. One wonder if there is any room left for the athletes or their supporters or even their family members who have made it possible for the existence of the competitor in the first place. Where is the consideration for them, one may have to ask that now as members were told to bugger off from one venue even though there were plenty of empty seats available. A major cockup I know but one that is becoming more and more common as the Olympic gestapo go about ensuring that the local butcher takes down his five ringed sausage display as it infringes on the billions they hope to cream off the local sheeple.

28 July 2012 10:50 PM

Join the smiley Cult of the Five Circles? Sorry, but I have a democratic right to be bored (and I'm exercising it while I still can)

This is Peter Hitchens' Mail on Sunday column
Enthusiasm is compulsory only in totalitarian dictatorships. Anywhere else, we are free to be keen if we want to, and bored if we want to.
So I wish people would stop telling me that I should enjoy the Olympics, or be proud of them, or think that they will in some way benefit this country.
But they won’t stop telling me. Hardly a day goes by without another previously independent mind surrendering to this pseudo-religion of obligatory smiles.
And that makes me suspicious. What is this strange cult? In the end, the Olympics is nothing more than a large athletics meeting.
Before Hitler and Dr Goebbels made it into a torch-lit and grandiose spectacle, you could be in the same city as the Games and barely notice.
Are we really that interested? And if we are, are we interested for good reasons?

We have the other article as well 

What the Papers didn’t Say -and What They Did

Meanwhile, on the subject of the legitimacy and reasonableness of my view of the Olympic ceremony, let me quote to you from an article by Chris Blackhurst, a former colleague of mine, and no fool,  now Editor of the Independent newspaper. You can read the whole thing here.

Chris (who I do not think would describe himself as a man of the right)  said : ‘Did I think I was being preached to? Was I aware that the director was ramming his vision of a leftie Nirvana down all our throats? Yes to both. Did I mind? Not in the least’

He also conceded :’There could have been more use words, more acknowledgement of our contributions to the arts and our faith in individual liberty’(these are my principal complaints about what was lacking. But he added ’This was an occasion for television, more than those lucky enough to be present’.

He makes a curious comment about multiculturalism, mistaking it – as so many seem to do – for multiracialism, a wholly different thing. He said ‘swathes of the population, not those perhaps in the stockbroker belt or secure in their gated communities, those of different ethnic origin living side by side is how it is’. Let me say it again. Multiculturalism is nothing to do with race. It is to do with abandoning the idea of one unifying national culture to which all are expected to belong, and choosing instead to promote a series of solitudes with their backs turned upon each other (some readers say, trying to be clever, that we no longer have much of a British culture to offer, but that is precisely because we abandoned it so long ago). Those who have sought to defend a unified national culture have been, and are still being, smeared as racial bigots, when this is the opposite of the truth. I am sad, but not amazed, that this still needs to be explained.