Solar and Wind Generation: Fail when needed the Most.

Windmill FAIL.

For those of you who feel good about reducing power generation, how would it feel if you were responsible for the actual deaths of people, due to your own ignorance ?

The majority of environmentalists are major hypocrites as we all already are well aware. Their environmental sensitivities stops at the front gate or at the airport gate. The hypocrisy also reigns when building a house, those fraudulent environmentalists claim to want to stop power usage and save trees, actually render more of both just to build themselves some over sized shelter. You will find plenty of timber in the entire design and structure as well as loads of products like brick, concrete and others being used in it's construction. They will also have major room for their over sized SUV ofcourse. But it's okay because they recycle, that is just enough to salve their hypocritical conscience while at the same time, demand reductions in power generation right up until their newly built establishment is in the dark. Only at that time do they see things clearly, one can only hope.

The massive hypocrisy is palpable and real, their pretentious lives survives on these fake and artificial feel-good efforts that will in the long term be the death of thousands of people just like Ethanol has starved people to death and the removal of using DDT under a false claim that it harmed people continues to kill millions of people from malaria. I certainly hope those environmentalist are still feeling good about themselves as all I see in them is mass murderers and flagrant introducer of pain and suffering to people around the globe. You are really pathetic and I sincerely hope that what you fight for comes back and bites you extremely hard, that would be poetic justice in the first degree.

Below is a graph that demonstrates how efficient Solar and Wind Power is in regards to the load that is required for people to function normally and properly, with the demand met. Both of those items FAIL when needed the most.

Todays Outlook

Get an at-a-glance view of supply and demand, renewable energy production, emergency notifications and requests for energy conservation. These displays are provided for information only and do not represent real-time system operating conditions. Click here for more information about this page.

Update...

Wind power not coming through for California – power alert issued by the CAISO

RoyFOMR says:
August 9, 2012 at 6:22 pm

24 hours in Ca.
Three stable renewable-power sources; Geothermal, Small Hydro and Biomass producing a total power of circa 1500 Mw.
Two fluctuating power-technologies (wind and solar) that together cumulatively produce a maximum of 1900 Mw at 1 a.m. to a minimum of roughly 6-700 Mw at 8 am.
Let’s call that 1500 + (1900+700)/2 Mw average capacity -> 2800 Mw ranging from 3400 Mw to 2200 Mw throughout the course of a day (+/- 21% of mean).
That’s a pretty wide range to keep on top of but, luckily, using Anthony’s link to CAISO this is a small fraction of ‘current’ demand of roughly 36000 Mw with a capacity of 50000 Mw at hand comprising some 47000 Mw of non-renewable power ( 94% ).
If we take the used capacity as non-renewables/ total demand as (36000-2800)/36000 we still get a creditable 92% as coming from ‘non-green approved’ sources.
This is all good news, so far, for Ca residents and manufacturers alike but there’s bad news looming.

Double the amount of wind and solar, reduce current stable-baseload generators to comply with new green-regulations and we get an increasing double-whammy that not only boosts the price of energy for producers and consumers but makes it less reliable!
To get to the demented targets of some e.g. 80% via renewables (wind, solar but very little else) does not require a doubling from the current 5-6% or so but a redouble to 10-12%, followed by a further redouble to 20-25% and then with reckless abandon to an ‘all-in’, shirt-betting scenario.
Madness. Total madness. Verily, the lunatics are now clad in white coats!!!!

AGW Scientists and Environmentalists: The Arrogance.

George Carlin. 

Saving the Planet.

The sheer unadulterated arrogance of the environmentalists. George hits it nicely on the head.

Merchants of Despair: Radical Environmentalists.

Erm!! the globe is cooling, no, warming erm no..Take a pick.

The good people from GWPF are referring to that feral crowd commonly known as "greenies", a term used to describe a bunch of beings who love trees more than the inhabitants of this planet. This is the same crowd that banned DDT, even though studies showed it had no long term harmful affect. They thereby condemned millions of people to death via malaria which the DDT was used to destroy those dangerous bugs that was causing so much destruction and harm to human life. But they just do not give a damn about that whatsoever. Totally and completely unmoved.

These are the same people, the same uncaring lunatics who determined that the poor in India should not have any hydro electricity but should die from lung disease by burning manure and other nefarious elements on their cooking stoves, mostly women and children. That made those greenies feel a lot better about themselves as well.

Yep. everything is warming but only inside, more logs on the  fire.

So now we have the Global Warming lunacy, an event totally controlled by the weather and completely disproved as being either catastrophic as claimed as well as being a natural action as precedence has already demonstrated from past weather conditions. But no, they prefer the hysterics and all those wild exaggerated, hysterical claims that people are going to fry in bed, alive. All types of suffering will be endured and the entire population of the planet will shrink by 4,5 billion in the flash on an eyelid. They have been saying that for twenty years, TWENTY YEARS. Have a walk outside and see if they are telling the truth !

Merchants of Despair: Radical Environmentalists And The Fatal Cult Of Antihumanism

The anti-global-warming crusade against carbon-based energy is the latest assault on progress and improvement. Zubrin is correct to call the climate-change movement a “global antihuman cult.” Its assaults against dissent, embrace of messianic leaders, and apocalyptic scenarios reveal a debased religious sensibility rather than scientific rigor.

 For more information on the subject have a read here and you may want to allocate quite a few hours to ensure you comprehend it..

Also this article where we can suggest that you follow the money. That's the bottom line..

Scientist Garth Paltridge:
Climate science has transformed itself from a research backwater a few decades ago into one of the greatest public-good scientific cash cows ever devised. In Australia, for instance, there is a separate federal Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency specifically devoted to implementing (buying?) the social change required to limit global warming. The livelihood of many of the climate scientists within the CSIRO and elsewhere is now dependent on grants from that department. It is not a situation conducive to sceptical outlook and balanced advice. When a tendency toward postmodern science is mixed with a single, generous and undoubtedly biased source of money, it is not surprising that things can go very wrong very quickly.

 That’s your money he’s talking about. The public cost of warming activism extends well beyond the carbon tax.