The Stench of Endless Presidential Corruption.

One does not have to search far or wide to witness more of the Obama Administration corrupt behaviour. One wonders why the majority of this type of behaviour is strictly a left wing, rights to passage or is it just because they have no morals or honesty in a single fibre of their body. Not only has Obama used his presidential options of by-passing Congress to introduce illegal laws that places the Constitution in the rubbish bin. But he has also demonstrated beyond doubt that if one pays a few bucks into his re-election campaign, they can be guaranteed to be paid back in millions of taxpayers dollars, which he has done already.

There should be a mechanism of bringing leaders like Obama and anyone for that matter, in front of the people and questioned. They should also be held accountable for failing to uphold the constitution of the US which he and others have not done. They are as close to being criminals as anyone can be and they should face the justice system who has also failed to even check if Obama was eligible for election to begin with. The entire system as well as the election of Obama stinks to high heaven. It has the stench of corruption regardless of where you look.

Federal Court finds Obama appointees interfered with New Black Panther prosecution

July 30, 2012 

A federal court in Washington, DC, held last week that political appointees appointed by President Obama did interfere with the Department of Justice’s prosecution of the New Black Panther Party.
The ruling came as part of a motion by the conservative legal watch dog group Judicial Watch, who had sued the DOJ in federal court to enforce a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents pertaining to the the New Black Panthers case. Judicial Watch had secured many previously unavailable documents through their suit against DOJ and were now suing for attorneys’ fees.
Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:

The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.
…
In sum, the Court concludes that three of the four fee entitlement factors weigh in favor of awarding fees to Judicial Watch. Therefore, Judicial Watch is both eligible and entitled to fees and costs, and the Court must now consider the reasonableness of Judicial Watch’s requested award.

The New Black Panthers case stems from a Election Day 2008 incident where two members of the New Black Panther Party were filmed outside a polling place intimidating voters and poll watchers by brandishing a billy club. Justice Department lawyers investigated the case, filed charges, and when the Panthers failed to respond, a federal court in Philadelphia entered a “default” against all the Panthers defendants. But after Obama was sworn in, the Justice Department reversed course, dismissed charges against three of the defendants, and let the fourth off with a narrowly tailored restraining order.
“The Court’s decision is another piece of evidence showing the Obama Justice Department is run by individuals who have a problem telling the truth,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “The decision shows that we can’t trust the Obama Justice Department to fairly administer our nation’s voting and election laws.”