|Takes the same effort to be stupid then it does to be smart. G20 Manage.|
There appears to be no limitation to the obvious lies and misinformation coming from lunatic lefties such as Anne Rose. Another one incapable of recognising the bleeding obvious and concentrating solely on the tunneled visioned hypocrisy of the AGW crowd. The precondition to belonging to this group is a healthy dose of cognitive dissonance as well as selective reasoning ability that allows one to believe other members of that same lunatic group.
One has to wonder how far they will go to completely submerge themselves into that delusion and what it will finally take for them to surface and actually admit that they had or have absolutely no idea whatsoever about what was really going on.
Following the delusion is the order of the day, even though there are thousands who can prove her wrong as well as over half of the population who has had a think about the AGW scare mongering has decided it is precisely that - scare mongering.
But do not let a good lie, a religious conviction, stand in the way of a good fairy tale. Fascinating that this is an example of the future generations demonstrating how the education system has failed them miserably already and prefer to follow delusional trends while claiming they even possess some grey cells capable of the thought process. I have my doubts.
But as usual, to be blatantly and obviously stupid one needs more words and Rose does not fail there either. She has swallowed that AGW ruse hook, line and latte.“SOY latte with honey” was climate-change warrior Anna Rose’s choice of coffee at a cafe.It gets worse:
“There has been a massive campaign of misinformation and confusion and doubt,” she says.And then the head of the Australian Youth Climate Coalition proceeds to demonstrate just that:
At the moment, Australia is on track for at least a one-metre rise by 2100.
And then the head of the Australian Youth Climate Coalition proceeds to demonstrate just that:
At the moment, Australia is on track for at least a one-metre rise by 2100.False. Note that even the alarmist CSIRO projects a maximum rise of 0.8 metres, and likely rises of much less:
Note that since publication of the AR4, Pfeffer et al. (2008) have argued that a rise in excess of 2 metres is “physically untenable,” and that a maximum rise of 0.8 metres (near the upper end of the IPCC AR4 projections) is more plausible.Note also that the observed sea level rise over the past 20 years is just 3.1mm a year (or 31cm per century) and falling:
Undaunted, Rose goes on:
it is not the polar bears and Barrier Reef, although they are affectedFalse.
From Canada’s Globe and Mail in April:
The debate about climate change and its impact on polar bears has intensified with the release of a survey that shows the bear population in a key part of northern Canada is far larger than many scientists thought, and might be growing.
The number of bears along the western shore of Hudson Bay, believed to be among the most threatened bear subpopulations, stands at 1,013 and could be even higher, according to the results of an aerial survey released Wednesday by the Government of Nunavut. That’s 66 per cent higher than estimates by other researchers who forecasted the numbers would fall to as low as 610 because of warming temperatures that melt ice faster and ruin bears’ ability to hunt. The Hudson Bay region, which straddles Nunavut and Manitoba, is critical because it’s considered a bellwether for how polar bears are doing elsewhere in the Arctic.