Prof.Hansen Fiddling the Temperature Again.

The master snake oil salesman still hard at it as the New IPCC report approaches,get lies in early.

There is apparently no difference between cherry picking results or downright lying. These UHI results are all indeed now questionable. But Hansen (Snake oil for all) does selectively cherry pick anyway, just to make his Hysterical Global Warming (we're all gonna die) claims surface at an convenient moment. Again and again this main driver of the AGW scare and hoax, keeps on keeping on, with a range of manufactured graphs than any reasonable scientist would be too embarrassed to show, let alone lay a name on it.
Hansen has no such hesitation as he is an embarrassment to the science he claims to represent. He has to go. One should only be allowed to lie and embarrass the good name on NASA for so long.

U.S. Surface Temperature Update for July, 2012: +1.11 deg. C

A question asked on Dr Roy Spencer's Site regarding Hansen's questionable cherry picking.

Peter Hartley says:

August 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM

It is interesting that the trend is quite close to the Watts et al (2012) trend of +0.155 deg C/decade for the Class 1/2 stations using their new classification system. While you do not have to worry about TOBS bias by definition, they were criticized for ignoring TOBS bias when using max and min observations only. Perhaps the similarity of their results with yours suggests that the TOBS bias adjustment (the largest adjustment made to the official temperatures) is unjustified.

Another thought — I wonder how many of your specific synoptic reporting time observations pertain to stations they have classified according to siting criteria? It might be interesting to look at the fixed time of day observations for stations in different Classes. Perhaps your co-author Christy, who also co-authored the Watts et al paper might be interested in following up that issue.

Hansen: Scaremongering Again as Usual.

This should in actual fact be the standard response to warmist scaremongering as it sums up precisely what it is they are permanently promoting -

"In a move of ruthlessly aggressive desperation, resort to data vandalism of an unconscionable nature."

So it continues as we witness more false and hysterical claims made by Mann about doom and gloom. Will we fry in our beds tomorrow, the next day, the next decade or next century ?
They claim we will but the general consensus is that we do not know enough about the climate or the weather to even come anywhere near having a guess let alone predicting it as a certainty. Those so called self proclaimed "experts" like Mann, Gore, Jones and McKibben made fallacious claims to further their own pockets rather than state anything that can be witnessed or proven. All we have seen so far in regards to the weather report of the future is questionable, erroneous "models" and they do not even release the maths behind it, just in case. It is a farce, in order to test the farce, go outside and hear the birds, watch the grass grow and the trees wave in the wind (depending where you are ofcourse). Have you noticed anything that will endanger your life ?

Whaaaaaaaa!!! We are all going to fry...

Hansen is back at it!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/climate-change-is-here–and-worse-than-we-thought/2012/08/03/6ae604c2-dd90-11e1-8e43-4a3c4375504a_story.html?wpisrc=emailtoafriend

All the ‘extreme weather’ is caused by ‘climate change’.

He really said, “It’s worse than we thought.”

This is the level of intellect and intelligence of those warmist sheeple. Here is the explanation on how and why there are droughts. It is all about daylight savings, ya know. That extra hour of sunlight is a killer and an unmeaseruble disaster waiting to happen, ya know.

Somebody protect me from these lunatics please.

Next we have the warmist's study and release methodology. It is how they operate in order to keep the fear in place and keep the funding coming.