AGW Scientists and Environmentalists: The Arrogance.

George Carlin. 

Saving the Planet.

The sheer unadulterated arrogance of the environmentalists. George hits it nicely on the head.

Carbon Tax: Australian Labor Government Stupidity.

 It's not Australia that needs a carbon tax, It's China who should be reducing theirs. One does wonder where that stupidity in Gillard's Labor government is derived from. Not only has the Australian Labor Government sold it's soul for thirty pieces of silver, it has and continues to steal ever more from taxpayers under false and obvious dishonest guises.

Take a look at the differences between the pollution in China (NO CARBON TAX) and Sydney in Australia (A $23per Ton Carbon Tax). Have a good, clear look at the difference and now have a think about the stupidity of the Labor government, influenced by their marxist Green partners in the Government and wonder whether or not those children in charge have any idea as to what they are doing.

One sure needs a tax on pollution

Andrew Bolt

Reader Julian and his wife were in Beijing last week and Sydney the week before. Julian asks:

One of these countries recently introduced a carbon tax to reduce pollution. Guess who..?

The top image is in China, the second is in Sydney with the Opera House behind. Now who needs the carbon tax more ?

Climate Change: Just a mention, gets you a Grant.

The photoshopped polar bear on dimishing ice. CAGW lies..

The entire CAGW theory and it's hallucinatory projections appears to be at an all time high. All that is required to receive taxpayers dollars is to include the words "climate change" and heh, presto, here's the money.

This level of stupidity is unsurpassed, the lies and exaggerations just keep on coming and it's the Labor Government under major lunatic Gillard and those whacko marxist Greens who are promoting precisely that great lie.

One wonders what level of ignorance and hysteria one has to approach and foster in order to inhale all that drivel, what level of soul selling is involved and also how does one reach such a level of dishonesty. Hopefully some day in the future, those charlatans will be exposed for the charlatans they really are and are forced to repay those tax dollars which should have gone to schools and hospitals and the odd road in bad state of repair.

How to write a modern grant application 

Andrew Bolt

July 25 2012 (8:15am)

How do you get a grant from the Australian Research Council? Just add the words “climate change” to your otherwise undistinguished grant application. Philippa Martyr demonstrates the extremes some researchers have gone to - and been rewarded for:

Civil Engineering: “This project will develop innovative light gauge steel roofing systems with considerably increased wind resistance and reliable design rules for cold-formed steel codes worldwide. It will contribute to the Australian government’s goal of increasing building resilience against future extreme and more frequent wind events caused by climate change.” ($320,000)
Political Science: “Commonsense says that claims about how social and political life ought to be arranged must not make infeasible demands. This project will investigate this piece of commonsense and explore its implications for a number of pressing issues, such as climate change, multiculturalism, political participation, inequality, historical justice, and the rules of war.” ($408,587)
Psychology: “Climate change represents a moral challenge to humanity, and one that elicits high levels of emotion. This project examines how emotions and morality influence how people send and receive messages about climate change, and does so with an eye to developing concrete and do-able strategies for positive change.” ($197,302)

Journalism and Professional Writing: “This project will examine the use of news management or ‘spin’ by Australian governments. Is it a legitimate tool of government in the face of a hyper-adversarial news media or a technique which undermines democracy? It will examine ‘spin’ in connection with policies on climate change, economic policy, indigenous policy and asylum seekers policy.” ($95,000)

Literary Studies: “The project will devise and develop a new ‘cultural materialist’ paradigm for science fiction studies and apply it to a case study of science fictional representations of catastrophe, especially nuclear war, plague and extreme climate change.” ($239,000)

Read on for more astonishing examples from the great green gravy train. UPDATE
Digging deeper, we find the winner of the journalism grant is former communist turned journalism academic David McKnight, who earlier received nearly $200,000 - or $3 a word - to write a predictably hostile book on Rupert Murdoch.
Dr Roberto Soria was onto this earlier this year (along with JoNova):

And by the way, number of winning projects that propose to test whether climate change is real or catastrophic: zero. The climate-change industry has really become a monster out of control.

Some of those projects would not have got a cent, if the government wasn’t under the influence of this collective hallucination.

There’s a whole parasitic class of academics who make a good living off the catastrophic climate change myth, and the larger this class grows, the more difficult it will be to burst the bubble. Anyway, just in case you think this is just sour grapes, it is not. I actually won a grant myself this round, and it is one of the few projects that will do absolutely nothing for or against climate change But I am sad to see so much research money wasted for nothing.

JoNova has had cause to chide McKnight for his writing on global warming:

Here’s a UNSW “Senior Research Fellow” in journalism who contradicts himself, fails by his own reasoning, does little research, breaks at least three laws of logic, and rests his entire argument on an assumption that he provides no evidence for.

Michelle Jenneker: A Genuine Female, Just being herself..

There does seem to be a thing that any female can do, that just knocks every one's socks off and it's not spending $ 28,000 on botox, fake tits and every thing else to present a fake and false frontage.

This lovely lady does what any female can do, while being totally feminine, sexy, engaging and totally capturing every one's attention just by - being herself. How is that for being different. For comparisons, have a look at the previous post.

 Michelle Jenneke Dancing Sexy as Hell at Junior World Championships in Barcelona 2012

Step Up for your NEW $28,000, Enhanced Girlfriend.

One could imagine what it would be like whenever one took one of these fake-a-trons out for a quick feed, a quick spin on the dance floor and jumped into the sheets with one of em!

That would be scary. Fake tits that wobble like a water bottles, with the feel factor of a genuine coke. The anatomy would be chemically enhanced with colorants including those emollients that strip the skin of it's normal feel and introduce that new "feels like Lycra" imitation..

Don't touch the mouth whatever you do as that just cost thousands to get the shape they are right now and any tension or touch might disrupt the shape, even thought the feel would be akin to sucking on a sausage wrapped in glad wrap. Oh and by the way, sex is out as that would leave marks, sweaty or otherwise, so forget that!!

Brain numbing reality programs is as pretentious as one can ever imagine. It would be impossible to do a farcical imitation of this irrelevant trash as it would just be a copy of what it is they already do..

One has to wonder how fake and offensive these women have to get to finally get the message that no one in their right mind would have a bar to do with their fake and disingenuous behaviour and nature. They have become clones of the Kardashians and Towies in the UK. But far more repulsive. One wonders what the aim of all this pretense is supposed to be apart from appealing to one's own over inflated and chemically damaged reality.
 

True cost of looking like Sophie Kalantzis from Ten's Reality show The Shire

• J. Mo and Elle
• The Sunday Telegraph
• July 22, 2012 6:50AM  

The Shire Sophie from The Shire at Cronulla Beach. Picture: Tim Hunter Source: The Sunday Telegraph IT costs a lot to look like this. The Shire's Sophie Kalantzis, 27, made no secret of her obsession with plastic surgery during the first episode of the new Ten reality show last Monday night, so we thought we'd calculate just how much the brunette beauty specialist has spent. She had two boob jobs, each costing about $10,000 while her regular Botox treatments cost between $600 and $1200 a visit. Her pillowy lips cost between $500-$700 every three months and her hair extensions cost $4000 a year. Kalantzis also admits to using a fat cavitation treatment and radio frequency on her legs that costs about $450. All up her plastic surgery bill would be more than $28,500. Staying with The Shire, local residents from the area were vocal about their disgust at the show, but figures reveal they watched its premiere in droves.

Does Being a Muslim require a Numm, Numm Brain..

Yep, they definitely look dangerous, Let's blow them up.

One does have to wonder what level of stupidity and obsession one has to undertake and learn in order to be a follower of some plodder back a few centuries who decided that sexually engaging with an eleven year old and also be a special chosen "person" for the the main man to talk to. One does have to wonder how far this is going to go. We have already witnessed some Taliban cretins murder and unarmed woman for whatever excuse and also read about some deadbeat assaulting another female because she was shopping with ut his special permission. I wondered how the hell he could tell any of them apart, as they all wear those black tents which apparently is not required under their sect at all. They have just determined some minor request and demanded that it be followed.

So now, those cretins want to blow up the pyramids. A stack of rocks that some a few centuries thought they would stack up to honour their King. But the Muslims Numb, Numb brain mentality has determined that it is jst not on and all things must be destroyed because it does not fit in too well with their lunatic view, amazing.

PYRAMIDS + EXPLOSIVES = PYRAMIST

Tim Blair – Friday, July 13, 2012 (7:28am)

Reader Vic recently asked:

How long before Morsi’s mob blows up the pyramids?

Possibly not very long at all:

According to several reports in the Arabic media, prominent Muslim clerics have begun to call for the demolition of Egypt’s Great Pyramids – or, in the words of Saudi Sheikh Ali bin Said al-Rabi’i, those “symbols of paganism,” which Egypt’s Salafi party has long planned to cover with wax. Most recently, Bahrain’s “Sheikh of Sunni Sheikhs” and President of National Unity, Abd al-Latif al-Mahmoud, called on Egypt’s new president, Muhammad Morsi, to “destroy the Pyramids and accomplish what Amr bin al-As could not.”
This is a reference to the Muslim Prophet Muhammad’s companion, Amr bin al-As and his Arabian tribesmen, who invaded and conquered Egypt circa 641. Under al-As and subsequent Muslim rule, many Egyptian antiquities were destroyed as relics of infidelity.

Ancient statues and tombs have already fallen to the current enthusiasm for re-development. What difference would a few detonated pyramids make?

Nobel prize winner Ivar Giaever: Climate Change = Pseudoscience

Catastrophic Photoshopped AGW image as verified. Falsified as Polar Bears are doing just fine.

The AGW hysterics pundits still make the claim that so many scientist promote and believe their fallacy that no one "notable or recognised" as a "real" scientist, ever states anything else than their inane AGW drivel.

That inane drivel has now been recognised and summarised by this Nobel prize winner. A winner of that prize when they use to actually award it on merit and not for politics as they did for the great imitator Obama and the world's greatest con man Al Gore. Both deserved a Nobel for inventions and snake oil salesman techniques, but that is about all.

We are all gonna die..

Jo Nova...

Nobel prize winner — Ivar Giaever — “climate change is pseudoscience”

Giaever stood his ground, dished it out for the Nobel committee, and pointed out the instruments are inaccurate, the results too small to mean anything, and called climate change “pseudoscience”. Merciless.

As he took the stage for his turn, Gieavar’s (sic) immediate remark was, “I am happy I’m allowed to speak for myself.” He derided the Nobel committees for awarding Al Gore and R.K. Pachauri a peace prize, and called agreement with the evidence of climate change a “religion.” In contrast to Crutzen and Molina, Gieavar (sic) found the measurement of the global average temperature rise of 0.8 degrees over 150 years remarkably unlikely to be accurate, because of the difficulties with precision for such measurements—and small enough not to matter in any case: “What does it mean that the temperature has gone up 0.8 degrees? Probably nothing.” He disagreed that carbon dioxide was involved and showed several charts that asserted, among other things, that climate had even cooled. “I pick and choose when I give this talk just the way the previous speaker picked and chose when he gave his talk,” he added. He finished with a pronouncement: “Is climate change pseudoscience? If I’m going to answer the question, the answer is: absolutely.”