Julia Gillard: They Attack because I am a Woman, Whaaaa!!

Gillard's corruption and dishonesty has to be exposed.

One does have to wonder whether we have an adult in the office of prime minister in Australia or just some silly little girl who makes the claims that it's all because she a women that she is being asked questions about her nefarious dealings in a developing a "slush fund" for a con artist who was her boyfriend at the time. Gillard throws up her hands and states that she knew nothing about this originally because she was "Young and Naive", at the time she was a lawyer and a thirty year old.

Originally ofcourse, she just pooh-poohed everything aside just like every dishonest left winger does as they "feel" that anything they do for the "cause" is excusable, justifiable and correct. She now claims that it was Larry Pickering who started this whole saga when in actual fact it was labour's former Attorney General  Robert McLelland, who first raised it in parliament a few months back. The same AG she sacked from that position to install the child like, pathetic incompetent Roxon, a brazen male hating feminist who has been associated with Sheilla Jeffreys, a radical feminist who attended the SCUM manifesto in Perth Western Australia in 2011 to work out a way of destroying men as lesbians do.

The entire saga has turned into a complete circus as the English media spinner, imported to deal with the vagaries that Gillard has generated herself by lying and cheating her way into office. The entire fraudulent episode in which over $ 400,000 worth of members money was stolen from the AWU (Australian Workers Union), has never been resolved, or recovered and no one has bothered to chase any of this up and no one has been made to answer the appropriate questions and no one has gone to jail over this, NO ONE.

The entire episode demonstrates the dishonesty and conniving actions of unions who have been supporting the Labour party for decades with millions of dollars of membership money and they are not answerable to anyone except themselves. The unions in Australia raise over ONE BILLION DOLLARS every year and no one knows where that money goes or where it is used.

The Labour Party has also demonstrated that they have hidden this, stalled and ignored any effort to find out where that money has gone or made any effort to have it returned. Nothing has been done to find out the real culprits because GILLARD'S name is associated with it and they have covered this up and buried it for the fear of exposing the criminal activities of the Union movement in AUSTRALIA.

GILLARD NEEDS TO RESIGN as she is tainted by this circus of thievery and dishonesty. Someone has to pay and the people who covered it up exposed. It is the way the law is supposed to work but in this case, it's the Labour Party covering themselves as way too many of those dishonest, corrupt individuals have been busy doing this for decades and no one wants to know why or how they go about it. Corruption is and has always been rife in unions worldwide because they are answerable to no one. They are above the law. Those criminals have to bought to justice.

Get Lost: Mann and the Mythical Hockey Shtick.

Mann is somewhat upset that someone has actually questioned his manipulation of the facts regarding the Global Warming Hoax, he is ofcourse one of the prime movers of the hysterics pertaining to that. No one should have the temerity to question as scientist of his "calibre", as he is all seeing and all knowing, and science in his view should not be questioned by anyone except the followers of the great AGW hoax. Just to keep the faith and ensure those billions keep rolling in.

The fact that scientists like Mann, Jones and others have continually discouraged, threatened and banned other scientists who have opposing views, appears to be an irrelevance. This is not how science should be encouraged or pursued but it is what they have blatantly done. Check the emails exposed from the UEA releases and read for yourself how these manipulators have conned the public especially when they could not explain why is was so cold. Best thing to do is to hide it and deny it's existence, which is exactly what they did. Snake oil salesman does not even come near to explaining their dishonest and blatantly illegal behaviour. Illegal, because they have used public funding to manipulate the facts.

How dare anyone question Mann and the suspicious hockey stick, which has been completely destroyed by the facts. So now he is suing those that want to expose him.

August 22, 2012 1:15 P.M.

Get Lost

My response to Michael Mann.

By Rich Lowry

So, as you might have heard, Michael Mann of Climategate infamy is threatening to sue us.

Mann is upset — very, very upset — with this Mark Steyn Corner post, which had the temerity to call Mann’s hockey stick “fraudulent.” The Steyn post was mild compared with other things that have been said about the notorious hockey stick, and, in fact, it fell considerably short of an item about Mann published elsewhere that Steyn quoted in his post.

So why threaten to sue us? I rather suspect it is because the Steyn post was savagely witty and stung poor Michael. Possessing not an ounce of Steyn’s wit or eloquence, poor Michael didn’t try to engage him in a debate. He sent a laughably threatening letter and proceeded to write pathetically lame chest-thumping posts on his Facebook page. (Is it too much to ask that world-renowned climate scientists spend less time on Facebook?)
All of this is transparent nonsense, as our letter of response outlines.
In common polemical usage, “fraudulent” doesn’t mean honest-to-goodness criminal fraud. It means intellectually bogus and wrong. I consider Mann’s prospective lawsuit fraudulent. Uh-oh. I guess he now has another reason to sue us.
Usually, you don’t welcome a nuisance lawsuit, because it’s a nuisance. It consumes time. It costs money. But this is a different matter in light of one word: discovery.
If Mann sues us, the materials we will need to mount a full defense will be extremely wide-ranging. So if he files a complaint, we will be doing more than fighting a nuisance lawsuit; we will be embarking on a journalistic project of great interest to us and our readers.
And this is where you come in. If Mann goes through with it, we’re probably going to call on you to help fund our legal fight and our investigation of Mann through discovery. If it gets that far, we may eventually even want to hire a dedicated reporter to comb through the materials and regularly post stories on Mann.
My advice to poor Michael is to go away and bother someone else. If he doesn’t have the good sense to do that, we look forward to teaching him a thing or two about the law and about how free debate works in a free country.
He’s going to go to great trouble and expense to embark on a losing cause that will expose more of his methods and maneuverings to the world. In short, he risks making an ass of himself. But that hasn’t stopped him before.

Here is why Mann is suing the Review -(Ed)

Football and Hockey

By Mark Steyn

July 15, 2012 6:22 P.M.

Comments

141

In the wake of Louis Freeh’s report on Penn State’s complicity in serial rape, Rand Simberg writes of Unhappy Valley’s other scandal:

I’m referring to another cover up and whitewash that occurred there two years ago, before we learned how rotten and corrupt the culture at the university was. But now that we know how bad it was, perhaps it’s time that we revisit the Michael Mann affair, particularly given how much we’ve also learned about his and others’ hockey-stick deceptions since. Mann could be said to be the Jerry Sandusky of climate science, except that instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured data in the service of politicized science that could have dire economic consequences for the nation and planet.

Not sure I’d have extended that metaphor all the way into the locker-room showers with quite the zeal Mr Simberg does, but he has a point. Michael Mann was the man behind the fraudulent climate-change “hockey-stick” graph, the very ringmaster of the tree-ring circus. And, when the East Anglia emails came out, Penn State felt obliged to “investigate” Professor Mann. Graham Spanier, the Penn State president forced to resign over Sandusky, was the same cove who investigated Mann. And, as with Sandusky and Paterno, the college declined to find one of its star names guilty of any wrongdoing.
If an institution is prepared to cover up systemic statutory rape of minors, what won’t it cover up? Whether or not he’s “the Jerry Sandusky of climate change”, he remains the Michael Mann of climate change, in part because his “investigation” by a deeply corrupt administration was a joke.

Apocalypse - Apocaholism.

Pending apocalypse is the endless scream we hear from the hysterics, world round. In order to make ludicrous as well as childish, unfounded claims, just like those religious freaks once did on a constant basis, has now been taken over by the left wing menagerie of lunatics who have actually made the claim that lying or exaggerating the facts, is a normal and accepted practise those misanthropes indulge in.

They "feel" justified, as they do whenever they scream that "the globe is warming and we're all gonna fry and die" hysterics that continuously surfaces from said plotters like Hansen, Gore, Jones, Trenberth et al as well as other apocalyptic screamers of doom and gloom.

Meanwhile we sit back and see exactly how correct they are or were or claimed to be. Let's see, the sun is still shining - check, the grass is still growing - check, the sun still gets up every morning - check. So where, may one ask is all this apocalyptal carnage and destruction those soothsayers keep stating will one day happen, when will it actually take place or are they just hoping or putting it out there just to see who falls for their Apocaholism ?

ADDICTED TO DOOM

Tim Blair – Wednesday, August 22, 2012 (3:03pm)

Matt Ridley on apocaholism:

Over the five decades since the success of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in 1962 and the four decades since the success of the Club of Rome’s The Limits to Growth in 1972, prophecies of doom on a colossal scale have become routine. Indeed, we seem to crave ever-more-frightening predictions—we are now, in writer Gary Alexander’s word, apocaholic. The past half century has brought us warnings of population explosions, global famines, plagues, water wars, oil exhaustion, mineral shortages, falling sperm counts, thinning ozone, acidifying rain, nuclear winters, Y2K bugs, mad cow epidemics, killer bees, sex-change fish, cell-phone-induced brain-cancer epidemics, and climate catastrophes.
So far all of these specters have turned out to be exaggerated. True, we have encountered obstacles, public-health emergencies, and even mass tragedies. But the promised Armageddons—the thresholds that cannot be uncrossed, the tipping points that cannot be untipped, the existential threats to Life as We Know It—have consistently failed to materialize. To see the full depth of our apocaholism, and to understand why we keep getting it so wrong, we need to consult the past 50 years of history.

(Via the GWPF)

Radical Chic and the Hoi Polloi..

It is always refreshing when one comes across an article that demonstrates and explains a little more than one can come up with. Not for the want of not trying, but just a better understanding of the situation. It is a serious condition and one that we all know is blatant and brazen as well as visually obvious but only a few would witness it. These are those people who want to pre-determine the lives of others while nimbly sipping their dry martinis with a touch of extra vermouth. They mingle with those wannabees and their fallow, pro-contemptious individuals, where the world according to those do not include anything requiring menial labour or carrying their own groceries to the car.

The New AA: Dr. Kimball’s Self-Help Program for Disillusioned Liberals

You’re seeing these sad people everywhere these days, especially in large East-and West-Coast urban areas and on college campuses. At parties they alternate between a melancholy, far-away wistfulness and a muttering “why me?”-belligerence. They’re touchy and quick to blame others, and they seem to suffer from night sweats and vague feelings of persecution. Their symptoms worsened suddenly a few days ago when it was announced that Paul Ryan would be joining the Romney ticket as candidate for vice president.
These people are not conservatives. It’s not clear that they’re liberals, exactly, either, though in recent history they have, as it were, caucused with liberals, that is to say, with people who identify themselves as liberals (never mind how illiberal their policies and sentiments happen to be). Above all, however, they are part of the tout le monde: the people who think of themselves as being on the right side of history (corollary belief: they think history has sides and a direction). They go to the right cocktail parties. They have “advanced” (i.e., establishment) attitudes about art, culture, and morals. They are part of that group Harold Rosenberg memorably denominated “the herd of independent minds.”
Tom Wolfe exposed an extreme version of this cohort in his essay on the Black Panthers hosted by Leonard Bernstein in his elegant New York apartment. Wolfe contributed the term “radical chic” to the language to describe the Bernsteins and their wide-eyed guests. What we’re dealing with here is not quite radical (though Obama may in fact be plenty radical himself, the semi-beautiful people who support him are not), nor is it wholly chic. It is a sort of “consensus chic,” though I appreciate the aroma of contradiction the phrase communicates, since that which is genuinely chic exists self-consciously apart from the consensus of hoi polloi.

First time around, these people voted for Obama, giving themselves a little frisson of self-satisfaction when they pulled the lever and, even more, when the emitted condescension about anyone who happened to vote for John McCain — they didn’t encounter such people often, but it always gave them a little thrill of self-satisfaction when they did. It wasn’t long, however, before doubts began to accumulate. The seas didn’t subside, as promised, nor did the unemployment figures. By now, they’re thoroughly depressed. Their man has clearly let them down, and the inadvertent comedy of Joe Biden screaming that Republicans are going to “put y’all back in chains” isn’t helping. Even worse is the news that team R&R, the Romney-Ryan express, is surging among young voters.

Natural Addiction and other circular arguments.

The endless ineptness and brutal irrelevance that the left-wing, newly enhanced self-appointed experts on all things human, never ceases to amaze me. They produce endless variables to account for stupid and moronic behaviour in order to justify base stupidity or hopelessness. The irrelevant and anarchist behaviour of the "Occupy Everything" movement is a fine example of their obvious ignorance and base stupidity. It demonstrated the new mindlock of their generation where everything should be handed to them on a platter and accountability for their actions is to be removed as being some new method of Imperialism or state police control.
This is the level of intelligence those universities are promoting and producing, where the "I want it all and I want it NOW" mantra is their main guideline and the "Give me everything" is not seen as being unreasonable but a claim that they deserve it all without consent or question. It is the way it is.

One wonders if anyone ever comes to grips with their blatant ignorance or the ever more ignorance they demonstrate. One would live in the hope that one day, as they get older, assuming they don't do anything obviously overly stupid, they may actually wake up to the fact that their behaviour can only be found in three year old children and their justification is straight out of a "Confessions of a mass murderer" novel, where everything can be explained away because the appropriate "feelings" can be counted on for justification. Actually a three year old would probably demonstrate to being brighter and smarter.

Peter Hitchens comes across another one of these clones who actually believes in an assumed enhancement, she terms "Natural Addiction", this way this lunatic justifies heroine addicts as being victims and their responsibility is pushed aside as they are determined to be the victim. Not because of their own stupidity, as everyone is well aware of the fact that heroine addiction is a killer waiting to finish it's work. Nope, the poor individual is a victim because that idiot is an addict. I know, circular arguments is their favourite way of expressing their ineptitude and their unwillingness to think anything through is non-existent, just going on "feelings" is sufficient. These type of people are actually capable of breathing, that is only because it's automated.

Victoria’s Secret

…is that she’s confused about what addiction means, and so cannot say anything sensible about it. The Victoria I’m referring to is Ms Victoria Coren, yet another metropolitan clever-dick who has found his or her way on to the comment circuit long before he or she has had time to become gnarled, world-weary etc. Photographs show her as anything but gnarled, despite the fact that she is, I’m told, a distinguished poker player, and consorts with alternative comedians, both of which would certainly gnarl me.

And I would have ignored her indefinitely had she not decided to lecture me, from a very elevated position indeed, on the subject of ‘addiction’. She did this here http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/19/victoria-coren-addiction-dont-be-kind-be-fair?newsfeed=true

in ‘The Observer’ an unpopular Sunday newspaper. But I shall now help her to become a bit more gnarled and world-weary.

It is an odd lecture. If I have properly understood her, she begins by comparing me to the Wolf in ‘Little Red Riding Hood’, thus : ‘On Newsnight, Russell Brand and Peter Hitchens had a pointless row about compassion. They were like Little Red Riding Hood and the wolf (one lustrous-haired and touchingly naive; the other snarling, clawing and evidently harbouring eager thoughts of the severed finger he'd popped in his pocket to eat later).’

Eh? Sometimes you just have to accept that other people’s thought processes are different from your own. I assume I’m not touchingly naïve (thank heaven for that, even if it also means my hair is not lustrous, which indeed it is not). Snarling and clawing? Well, if you didn’t like me, because I have bad opinions and must therefore be a bad person, you might choose to describe reasonable self-defence in these terms. But putting a severed finger in my pocket to eat later? What? Where did that come from?

AS for being ‘pointless’. No serious person can dismiss as ‘pointless’ a public argument about principles which makes others think.

Anyway, it then gets (slightly ) more coherent and to the point. As in : ‘But compassion is irrelevant to the categorising of addiction. Accepting it's an illness doesn't mean you have to care.’

**Oddly enough, I should have thought it did mean exactly that. If someone has fallen ill through no fault of his own, you are rather obliged to care, be sympathetic, be concerned in healing him. That’s why the difference is important. If this person has deliberately, having ignored a thousand warnings, inflicted the wound on himself, you must of course still care about his grief and his wound, but in a significantly different way. This raises another simple point; that those who would use fear of punishment to deter people from self-destruction don’t necessarily lack compassion. They just don’t mix it up with soft-headedness.

Ms Coren is apparently giving up smoking tobacco. Good luck to her, I hope very much she succeeds, as I know in some detail what will probably happen to her if she doesn’t. Many people do give up , though it is obviously extremely hard. The difficulty arises not least because cigarettes are legal, openly on sale in many shops. They are also socially acceptable in many places (such as poker games, and for all I know among alternative comedians). Perhaps that is why, as Theodore Dalrymple says, from his observations of heroin abusers while working as a prison doctor, that it is harder to give up smoking , by some way, than it is to give up heroin.



The remorseless logic, or remorseless something-or-other, continues as follows : ‘They say heroin feels good to begin with. Smoking doesn't. But, if you're a natural addict, you press on.’



**Here we go. Into the argument this curious assertion hops, unexplained, simply stated as if an uncontested fact. ‘If you’re a natural addict, you press on’. How many huge questions does this raise? Who is, and who is not ‘ a natural addict’? How does one test objectively for the presence of this condition in the human body? Do ‘natural addicts’ still fall victim to their ‘natural addictions’ in societies that Ms Coren would no doubt regard as ‘repressive’, that is, ones in which people are taught from their earliest youth to control their urges, to delay gratification and to mistrust pleasure that has not been earned? Would the hundreds of thousands of alleged heroin ‘addicts’ in modern Britain have become ‘addicts’ had we maintained the culture, laws and morals that we had before about 1960?

If these are significant variables, can the phrase ‘natural addict’ have any validity? Human weakness is universal and lies in all of us. Mine is particularly unexciting. I eat too much (not usually fingers, though) . I could stop if I really wanted to. Sometimes I do. I keep it under reasonable control most of the time. But I don’t care enough to get it fully under control. My guess is that it will kill me only very slowly and not too unpleasantly. It’s also unlikely to make me a burden on other people. But the fault is in me, in that I could try harder if I really wanted to. I can’t blame anyone else. I would despise myself if I did.

As for smoking, I think many people start doing it not because of how it feels, but because of how they think it makes them look. The ancient problem of what to do with your hands (and face) in an awkward social situation is solved. The advertisements - when they had them - played quite cleverly on that, getting non-smokers to envy the cool, socially adept, sophisticated person they would become once they began sporting that particular smart packet (don’t believe that isn’t important, especially to women), and lighting that particular brand with a practised flourish. It might make you cough and vomit to start with, but passing through that stage was a necessary step to becoming the new cool you.

Now that it’s socially less acceptable, and often banned in resorts of pleasure, and now that everyone knows how dangerous it is, aren’t quite a lot of ‘natural addicts’ either giving it up or never starting? In which case, how natural were they? The phrase doesn’t really help at all. It’s certainly not the objectively scientific term Ms Coren seems to think it is (because it suits her to think so). As for Heroin users, *nobody*, but *nobody* is ignorant of the risks of this drug, and I believe it takes several goes to reach the stage where you imagine you can’t live without it. So could it be that you just press on because you’re a naturally selfish, thoughtless, inconsiderate little toad who places his own pleasure above all other considerations (as most of us are, when the mood takes us)? How much nicer, though, to be called a ‘natural addict’ . It takes away the crucial aspect, that you might yourself have been involved in choosing whether or not to poke a sharp ( and quite possibly dirty) piece of metal into your body and using it to pump an illegal poison into your bloodstream - which you already knew was a stupid thing to do.

Ms Coren continues :’Once you're hooked, it still doesn't feel good, but (and here's where we fall in with our junkie cousins) it now makes you feel normal. QED: if you have to take something to feel normal, it doesn't matter if it's a fag or a needle or a Nurofen, you're not well.’

**Once again, this is an assertion, and a self-serving one as well. Ms Coren was born, I think , in 1973. Long before she could talk or read, it was established beyond all doubt that smoking was terribly dangerous to your health, and particularly to the health of women. Why, even in my Jurassic childhood I can remember a pair of huge scary billboards outside Portsmouth Town Hall (circa 1962) with the legend ‘Ashes….to Ashes’. The first showed an ashtray with a lit cigarette. The second portrayed a large urn of human ashes marked ‘RIP’ .

She *must* have known what she was doing. I have never quite been able to get out of my mind this fact about many members of my generation. I think the problem with them (the smell of smoke has always repelled me, and my sense of smell has always been very strong. My attempts to start were foredoomed) was that the coolness, the sexual signal (the smoker is surely more worldly, more humorous, more available than the non-smoker, as Hollywood has for years been at pains to suggest) , the ability to satisfy the craving for something to taste without the risk of getting fat, the membership of a club of sophisticates, simply overrode all the warnings, of a peril which seemed so distant anyway. What if we might one day die? We all have to die of something. Ho ho. Well, I know a bit more than I did then about what cancer does to the human frame towards the end, and it’s my view that we might make a bit more of this in propaganda. It’s quite important, it turns out, which something you die of, not least because dying can take quite a while these days.

But of course the advertisements and the general social acceptance made each decision to give up an individual, solitary, slightly priggish one, and each decision to continue a collective, socially acceptable, even cool one. I think that has begun to change among educated, professional people, partly thanks to office smoking bans, partly thanks to advertising bans and pub and restuarant bans, partly because that selfish generation have children of their own and a) want to see them grow and b) don’t want to give them a dreadful example. In a small but limited way ( necessary because it's very hard to ban something in wide use which has always been legal) the threat of the law has helped to reduce this scourge. In the case of heroin and cannabis, already illegal, we have a much wider scope for preventive, deterrent action.

Ms Coren declares : ‘Unlike Nurofen, the addict's substance is both treating and creating the agony.’

**Agony? Isn’t that putting it a bit high?

Ms Coren again’ So every smoker/junkie, however desperate (** ‘desperate’. This overused word needs to be examined every time it’s employed. It has suffered severe inflation. In this case, doesn’t it actually mean , at most ‘ desirous’ . In which case, can’t the person involved control the desire? Of course he can. But he doesn’t want to) ‘…to keep going, wishes he had never started. If you saw someone repeatedly smashing his arm against a wall, 40 times a day, unable to stop, would you say he was a self-indulgent hedonist? Or would you just know he was ill?

**My reply. It’s all very well saying you wish you had never started. But why? Where is the surprise trick ending? What didn’t they tell you? If you really wished that, you actually wouldn’t have started. You wanted to start. You did so knowing this would happen. You wanted to. You didn’t care. Likewise, if you really wished to stop, you would stop. The true desire to stop is the heart of all abstinence programmes, as everyone knows. If someone got pleasure or other advantage from the sort of self-harm described, then yes, hedonism could explain it.

Then I get :’ Fear not, Peter Hitchens; that doesn't make you Pollyanna.’

**No, indeed. No danger of that .It’s Ms Coren I’m calling Pollyanna, and Mr Brand too.

Ms Coren : ‘You can still hate and blame the patient.’

**Who said I hate these people? I’m rather famously (the religion is famous, not me) not allowed to hate people by my religion, a religion Ms Coren may know little about and might well, given her generation and milieu, despise. I don’t presume to know (as she presumes to know so much of my mind) , so I am happy to be corrected if I am mistaken. I can loathe actions, but never the people that do them. As for the use of the word ‘patient’, once more an assertion not backed by evidence, this simply assumes a conclusion which is not proved or agreed. How could I blame a patient? But I can blame a wilful criminal, and I do.

Ms Coren ‘No need to feel compassion’. **On the contrary. But compassion is not the same as indulgence of wrong actions. It may actually require a serious attempt to deter or punish those wrong actions.

IS OUR PRIME MINISTER A CROOK?:

Larry Pickering as well as the general population appear to think so as the polling suggests. Labelled as the worst prime minister in history, Julia Gillard as well as Slater & Gordon have a lot to answer.

The entire episode smacks of corruption, greed and illegal activities which no one has come to answer. Not completely anyway, one wonders who is doing the covering up on this disaster and why there is a prime minister in Australia whose is tainted with illegal activities, illegal manipulation of the law and questionable responses where she continually makes the claim that she has answered the question when she has not ever come near to explaining this entire menagerie of fraud and corruption.

Someone has to pay for this and that someone is Julia Gillard as one could assume that she is covering up as much as possible to keep herself in that position.

IS OUR PRIME MINISTER A CROOK?:

Julia wandered aimlessly around her Abbottsford home. She had been unemployed for almost six months since she was sacked from Slater & Gordon. Her money had run out and her boyfriend, Bruce Wilson, had run off. Those lost six months were to mysteriously disappear from her CV.
If only things could have been different. She now knew she could never practise law again and anyway her Practising Certificate was soon to expire.
Julia had put her neck on the line for that bastard Wilson. He had promised her the world and she got peanuts from their clever scam. He was safe back in Perth with his wife, Francine, and the boys. She was left alone and with nothing.
The truth was Julia had knowingly help set up the infrastructure for Wilson’s money laundering. With the help of another Slater & Gordon Partner, Bernard Murphy, she had drawn up the documents that allowed Wilson to open a fraudulent account through which the extorted funds were to be laundered.
She had set up a Power of Attorney for Wilson to act on behalf of his friend Ralph Blewitt in laundering the funds. Wilson and she were living in the Kerr Street home bought with the stolen funds including a mortgage arranged in the name of Slater & Gordon’s Senior Partner, Jonathon Rothfield.
“Fall guy” Blewitt was blissfully unaware of the mortgage.
When the Kerr Street home was sold the money vanished. Blewitt, the oblivious owner, did not see a cent.
Meanwhile, back in Perth, Wilson was living the life of Riley. He had bought a restaurant called “Rumbrellas” and had spent $330,000 on renovations. Unfortunately, although Wilson was a dab hand at stealing, his business acumen was appalling. “Rumbrellas” was soon in liquidation. Wilson was broke.
He asked his offsider Ralph Blewitt for a $20,000 loan. Blewitt refused. Wilson suggested to Blewitt that one phone call to Big Bill Ludwig and Blewitt would never work again. That wasn’t true of course but Blewitt loaned him the money anyway. The loan was never repaid.
Back at Abbottsford, Julia called a friend, Carol Pyke, who had ALP connections in Victoria and asked her if she would move in to help defray the costs. She did and Julia eventually sold her half of the Abbottsford property.
Despite her known involvement in the extortion/money laundering affair, Julia was still determined to enter Parliament. But each time she sought pre-selection she was thwarted by her own Party. Centre Unity faction members of the ALP insisted Julia Gillard, of the Socialist Left faction, was an unsuitable candidate because of the known scandal.
[Many years later, power broker, Mark Abib, was to negotiate Gillard swapping factions to allow her to become Prime Minister... and without reference to Caucus.]
The focus is now back on Slater & Gordon. Although a listed company they still refuse to come clean on what went on. Why was their client, the AWU, not alerted to the false accounts? Why was the AWU not told of the funds, the laundering, the house, the conveyancing, the mortgage, the profit from the sale of the house?
They refuse to release the conveyancing details of the Kerr Street property claiming privilege. Yet there is no privilege associated with conveyancing.
It was rightfully AWU members’ money. It was Slater & Gordon’s Partners Gillard and Murphy and senior Partner Rothfield who set the whole thing up!
Convicted Partners of Keddies Law firm, owned by Slater & Gordon, have outwitted creditors of millions, according to a report in tomorrow’s Sydney Morning Herald.
Disclosure of Freedom of Information documents is being thwarted by the Victorian Police. “Too busy”, they say.
They have sat on the application for two months and say it may be another two months. Regulations demand a period of no longer than 30 days.
In the meantime “Pickering Post” is being constantly attacked by hackers using DDoS.
They may silence us for a while but the truth will out.
Much more to come.

How To Cook the Books on Global Warming by Dr Phil Jones, Prof James Hansen and Tom Rigley.

The temperature record is an honest and real representation of the climate, no really. They stake their reputation on it.

 Global Warming Dishonesty and Caprice

Whenever you catch anyone in an act of dishonesty, be it a child with it's hand in the cookie jar or the smell of weed in someone's bedroom. You automatically know it has to be dealt with, swift, clean and honestly. That is the way it is.
When people notice that some scientists have deliberately and dishonestly exaggerated  temperature results and skewed the outcome to suit their own purposes, they should face some level of accountability and be held accountable for those lies and distortions. The predominately left wing thinking process does not work in that way ofcourse.
They will turn a blind eye to dishonesty, lies, cheating and law breaking (think Occupy Everything, with rape, assaults, carnage, thievery etc) while still demanding that those action are legitimate and their "intentions" were honourable. The rabble prefer ignorance and lies to facts and honesty. It is the way they think. Stupid is as stupid does, should in reality be their calling card and their main slogan.

Never before published paper on UHI and siting – Goodridge 1987

Mind you, this is data that Jim used prior to the big range of adjustments that have been applied by NCDC. Jim provides all that data in the paper. It might be interesting to compare the data then and now to see what has been done to it. Another important distinction of note is that this paper was presented over a year before NASA’s Dr. James Hansen went before the Senate in June 1988, and touted his science and model predictions, deeming it so solid that they had to turn off the air conditioning in the hearing room for “theatrical effect”.
Figure 6 and 7 on page 10 are also instructive:

 
When comparing the temp. results with other factors like population, as compared to open areas where these stations should be, we have an entirely different picture. We can see clearly how the population effects the temperature in a big way. It can be easily shown when comparing population growth with temperature increase. That would ofcourse be a given, as more tarmac, concrete and buildings will store more heat than an open paddock.

Plus answers to yesterday’s Fun puzzle: Name these official stations.
Given that California Governor Jerry Brown has recently setup a website at the governor’s office basically telling skeptics to “shut up” I thought this would be a good time to publish this.
This is a paper that was presented at a climate conference by Jim Goodridge, former State Climatologist of California, titled Population and Temperature Trends in California at the Pacific Climate Workshop, in Pacific Grove, CA March 22-26, 1987.

 Bingo, below, the liars and exaggerators are being continually exposed and nothing and no one in position of power is even bothering to bring them to account. What the hell is going on here. Is everyone complicit in this hoax ?

More information on this link.


Memorandum submitted by Richard S Courtney (CRU 01)

In a press release at

http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/science_technology/s_t_cru_inquiry.cfm

your Select Committee "announces an inquiry into the unauthorised publication of data, emails and documents relating to the work of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA)."

Here are the graphs to demonstrate the effect of population growth and temperature.

Bad Things that Are Good for YOU.

Here are a few things that are supposed to be bad for you but are actually the exact opposite. Live Science suggests that we need to take a closer look at a few things which, as usual, the so called experts, are always telling us the bleeding obvious. But when it comes down to consuming anything it is almost always bad news.
Take for example a hamburger, when was the last time, if ever, you were told or informed whether or not it has any nutritional value at all. Surely there would be some benefits when eating protein, carbohydrates and fresh greens. But no, it's always bad news, just like they have some agenda they are working under. If in doubt, try the Biafran diet.
Everyone knows that food and drink in moderation never did anyone any harm and that's a fact. But not one of these "experts" have EVER stated anything about a Mac except the negatives. Bugger em all, I say.

Oh, and don't muck about with the last example as it can cause a bad disease called pregnancy. Too much of that happening already. Oops, that was last century, I forgot.

Move examples here on Live Science...

Here

Credit: Dreamstime

Red Wine

A crucial ingredient in the diets of the world's heart-healthiest populations-like those Bordeaux-guzzling French-red wine has long been known to have potent anti-cancer and artery-protecting benefits. The key, some studies indicate, is an antioxidant found specifically in the skin of red wine grapes, called resveratrol. The latest studies even link resveratrol to greater endurance, a reduction in gum disease and Alzheimer's. White wine, which is fermented after the skins are removed, is less beneficial according to some studies.

Credit: Yuri Arcurs | Dreamstime

Coffee

Java is one of the most debated substances around. Is it good for you? Is it bad for you? Both? The consensus, now anyways, seems to favor those who enjoy their morning jolt — unrelated studies claim coffee is a major source of antioxidants in our diet and can help lower your risk of diabetes. Something in the beans is also thought to ease the onset of cirrhosis of the liver and pancreatitis, good news for those who like to party hard all night before their morning caffeine boost.

Credit: Dreamstime

Anger

If you're one of those people who tends to bottle things up, only to explode ... don't hold it in so long. Studies show that bursts of anger here and there are good for the health, and can be an even more effective coping mechanism than becoming afraid, irritated or disgusted. Anger, like the consumables in this list, however, is best in moderation: stay angry for long periods of time and you'll be plagued with a host of health issues, like blood pressure, sleep disorders and lung damage.

Credit: Jlvdream | Dreamstime

Beer

The newest bad kid on the block, beer has long been overshadowed by its healthier alcoholic cousins. While no one's suggesting you switch that glass of antioxidant-rich Pinot Noir for a tall glass of lager-there's still that beer gut to worry about-new research has suggested that moderate beer intake can actually improve cardiovascular function. Now if only a scientist will discover the health benefits of ballpark franks and chicken wings. Heaven.

Credit: Dreamstime

Sex

Scientists have found that the benefits of sex go beyond immediate, ahem, gratification and satisfying the goal of procreation. Besides the obvious evolutionary purposes, we can all take pleasure in the news that having sex is an easy way to reduce stress, lower cholesterol and improve circulation throughout the body. As if you needed another excuse.

Julia Gillard Once Again Demonstrates her Arrogance.

Sold her soul to the Greens and lied to the Australian electorate. She has to go.

Again, the endless denials by Gillard is becoming an embarrassment to all in the government, not only because she appears incapable of being honest about anything, but her claim that she has already justified or explained her questionable, if not illegal behaviour, is far from being explained. Nothing has been forthcoming, no statement made stating precisely how involved she was or how she has benefited from associating while being in a relationship with the crook who lifted over $ 400,000 from the AWU Union members and other businesses. Gillard set up the slush fund account, now she claim she was only a naive girl at 30 years of age even though she is a lawyer. A claim which is ofcourse very heard to believe as it is so obviously ridiculous. One can claim to be naive at 16 years of age but not at 30. I ain't falling for that one.

Julia Gillard’s refusal to give answers is not likely to give a single person confidence - and certainly not her colleagues:

PRIME Minister Julia Gillard is facing new leadership concerns among key cabinet and caucus supporters over the revival of an alleged 17-year-old union slush fund scandal involving her former boyfriend…

Those fears were compounded yesterday during a fiery interview on Sky’s Australian Agenda, when Ms Gillard refused to address allegations raised against her…

This is a good example on how left wing socialists and especially feminists have a total disregard for honesty, dignity or honour. They only recognise their own self generated blame-free system, one that consists of destroying everything besides what they believe to be of importance. Lying, cheating and stealing, exaggeration and bare faced dishonest conduct, is their forte. They view as a credit or a positive trait that everyone should also have. Their arrogance and dishonesty is blatantly obvious and promoted as an alternative reality. They live a life where any end or outcome justifies the means. If lying, cheating and stealing is part of it, than it's just fine as long as they achieve that they are happy and if anyone dares to question that they are faced with claims of bias, racism or anything else they can find.

In reality, the Gillard Government did not get anywhere near the majority vote, the opposition party actually won with more votes but not enough seats to win government. Gillard sold her soul to the Greens and lied to the Australia people and hence has now the lowest rating any prime minister has had in Australia. So the lies continue as well as the misconduct.

Allegations were raised at the weekend by a former partner at the firm, Nick Styant-Browne, suggesting Ms Gillard may have acted improperly in helping set up a slush fund for Mr Wilson…

 Mr Styant-Browne said yesterday that he stood by the article and the claims made....

“I am not aware of any denial by the PM or her spokesperson of any specific allegation about what she said in the Slater & Gordon internal interview,” he told The Daily Telegraph.

 Even one of the partners at the Lawyer firm where she worked at the time has stated that she has a case to answer but obviously she doesn't think so as she has not bothered explaining any part of the shenanigans that went on years ago. No one was arrested or charged. Gillard is right in the middle of it.

 EACH time Julia Gillard is asked about a union corruption scandal involving her then-boyfriend and client, she gives the same non-answer.

 The Australian got it last week: the Prime Minister “was not involved in any wrongdoing and has dealt with these allegations previously”.

 Same from her yesterday on Sky: “I am not dignifying all of this scurrilous campaigning by going through these things point by point ... We are talking about matters 17 years ago, which have been dealt with on the public record for most of that time.”

Actually, they haven’t been dealt with - and Gillard’s evasions are no longer good enough.

Fantastic: Pussy Riot Jailed for Two Years. UPDATE.

This has really made my day, I would have been severely annoyed if these hypocrites had been let off as they have all around the world. About time they were held accountable, excellent.

It is great to see justice done, but this time it is the Russians who demonstrate how to deal with these  snarky, religious hating feminists and put them in place. Unlike America where those harridans were given free license to do whatever they wanted and paid for it at the same time.

These three harridans believed they could smear and denigrate the main Russian religion without any accountability and get away with their little hysterical demonstration. Finally we witness what should happen when these hypocrites who make claim to be for "equality", it's just another fanatical group of lunatics who believe that just because they are women, they are untouchable.

Mamouska is waiting for your new butts, hypocrites.

The Russian court had other ideas. We have already witnessed the "equality" of the feminastie movement with the slandering, sexual abuse and other sexual innuendoes dished by those feminists in Washington. The Old Girl's Club has been exposed and have been demonstrated to being the lying, envious male haters, that is really what they are all about. Nepolitano and her lesbian girlfriend have clearly demonstrated that. Those feminists are in it for the money and the abuse they can dish out. What a totally obnoxious sex they have become. They are a major embarrassment to decent, normal people who only aim in life is to live a normal life.

Napolitano-run dept. treated male staffers like lapdogs: suit

Russia's female punk band protesters jailed for two years

 The group's backers burst into chants of "Shame" outside the Moscow courthouse and said the case showed Putin was cracking down on dissent in his new six-year term as president. Dozens were detained by police when scuffles broke out.

The United States and the European Union condemned the sentence as disproportionate and asked for it to be reviewed, although state prosecutors had demanded a three-year jail term and the maximum sentence possible was seven years.

 ICE chief of staff on leave after new allegations of lewd conduct surface

"ICE has referred these allegations to the DHS Office of Inspector General and the ICE Office of Professional Responsibility for review. Ms. Barr has voluntarily placed herself on leave pending the outcome of this review," ICE Public Affairs Director Brian Hale said in a written statement.

In the newly emerging affidavits, one of the employees claimed that in October 2009, while in a discussion about Halloween plans, the individual witnessed Barr turn to a senior ICE employee and say: "You a sexy" (expletive deleted).

Julian Assange is the most annoying and arrogant person in the whole world.

Assange is in deep and way over his head. To make matter ever worse, the self deluded elitist has opted to become a member of the Communist dictators admiration squad in Ecuador. It is akin to signing a pact with the devil. It may even be worse.
Considering that Assange does have some questions to answer regarding shagging those two sheilas(sl. aussie for women) in Sweden, a country that is run by the feminasties and are determined to thrown him into prison, based solely on his genitalia. The fascinating thing about all this is that the "so called" countries legal system is quite happy to accept the claim of these two feminists as gospel, no witnesses or prove required.

Which is quite interesting as it is a studied and proven fact that the girls are known to tell the odd fib or three. Actually they do that a lot, in order to save the feelings of others apparently. But Assange's feelings here apparently have no significance or relevance at all, as they accept the claims that he raped the two women, when all he did was dip his stick without a condom on, stupid I know but hardly worth spending a few years in the slammer over, in my opinion. It all came about when the two girls found out about each other and that was only the beginning. They probably thought they were the one to snare this sucker.

Personally, I think that Assange is just a twat or a twot (take your pick), suffering from some self delusional do gooder ideals, having exposed information that will be responsible for people's deaths.

Assange and his group of left wing lunatics are just like the rest of their ilk. They are ten years behind common sense and always claim that they are doing the right thing regardless of the harm or the deaths it may cause. Same as the Ethanol disaster(destroying food) as well as the DDT con job, which has caused the death of millions, but that's ok because it makes them feel better.
They rationalise it with some inbuilt justification factor, an ability that fails to comprehend any common sense at all. So people die, so what - but they saved the planet from, you know, erm...something...But it is the way it is.

Here's why Julian Assange is the most annoying and arrogant person in the whole world

By Brendan O'Neill World Last updated: August 16th, 2012

Julian Assange: the internet age’s Carlos the Jackal

Julian Assange is an arrogant so-and-so, isn’t he, ensconced in the Ecuadorian embassy, no doubt entertaining himself with self-flattering fantasies about being the internet age’s Carlos the Jackal. I wonder how he got to be so cocksure? It’s probably because for much of the past three years he was treated by liberal opinion-formers and vast swathes of the international media as a Mother Teresa-like spectral saint of the computer age, as the sole possessor of The Truth about everything in the whole world. Assange’s self-encampment in the Ecuadorian embassy and point-blank refusal to answer allegations made against him are infuriating some liberal observers. But for the source of his supreme cockiness, they should look close to home – for it was their embarrassingly teenage fawning over Assange that imbued him with that self-possession that borders on superciliousness.

Aside from a few saddos who have managed to peel themselves away from Warcraft long enough to wave “Free Julian!” placards outside the Ecuadorian embassy, there aren’t many Assange fans left in Britain. It is now de rigueur to sneer at the white-haired Wikileaks weirdo and to wonder: how did he come to be such an enormous and annoying twit? I know the answer to this question! It’s because before his crazily effusive supporters in the world of journalism decided to turn against him, he was flattered to within an inch of his life, elevated by the international media from a computer-bound spouter of conspiracy theories (which is all he ever was, and remains) to what New Yorker magazine called a “rail-thin being who has rocketed to earth to deliver humanity some hidden truth”. I mean, just listen to what Nick Davies of the Guardian once said to Assange: “We are going to put you on the moral high ground, so high that you’ll need an oxygen mask.” And they did – not just the Guardian but loads of serious publications, and just about every activist on the Left, all of them pushing Assange farther and farther up the mountain of morality so that not only did he need an oxygen mask, but he also no longer needed to explain himself or his actions to us mere mortals down below, including the Swedish authorities.

The liberal set’s beatification of Julian Assange reached stratospheric levels of stupidity in recent years. A fanboy book on Wikileaks by Guardian journalists Luke Harding and David Leigh said Assange was “like Jason Bourne”, and then went further and said he was a mix of “Mother Teresa and Nelson Mandela”. He is “brave, uncompromising and dangerous”, they said, as part of the Guardian’s mission to “put [him] on the moral high ground”. Time magazine made him a runner-up in the 2010 Person of the Year Award. He was held up as an otherworldly creature capable only of speaking the truth, in particular by the Holy Trinity of international publications that initially published his revealed wisdoms: the Guardian, the New York Times and Der Spiegel. When Assange found himself being slated by American officials, who said they would quite like to feel his collar, an American journalist said we were witnessing “the persecution of truth itself”. The notion that Assange was some kind of Messianic embodiment of truth was taken to its logical conclusion by one conspiracy-theory website, which said: “Just like Jesus of Nazareth, Julian Assange had a mission to reveal the truth. Now, just like Jesus, he faces persecution and/or death on false and trumped-up charges.”

You know what? When people compare you to Jesus, Mother Teresa, Nelson Mandela and Jason Bourne, when Time magazine bows down before you, when the entire Left does the secular equivalent of giving you a Magdalene-style foot-rub, when the Guardian’s best-known reporter promises to “put you on the moral highground, so high”, you are going to turn into a twat. It’s just inevitable. Treat someone like a Messiah and they will behave like one: all-powerful and invincible and never deigning to speak to mere men of the law or other worldly pursuits. And thus was a conspiracy theorist from Down Under turned by an educated cheering mob into a modern-day Moses. Assange is an annoyance of the liberal media’s making.

AWU and HSU Union has Some Explaining to do to Members.

It's that old saying at work, power corrupts and total power corrupts, totally. This is how and what the Unions in Australia have been doing for the last 30 years without so much as anyone lifting a finger to stop them, even when the facts were there in front of them, as well as the paper work as well as the  thieves themselves.

The AWU (Australian Workers Party) and the HSU (Health Services Union) have both been exposed as being totally corrupt and failing to do anything about the abuses that both Unions have encountered over the years. First there was evidence that showed that a $500,000 account had been setup, money coerced from companies and promptly stolen by members of the Union executives and spent on everything else besides Union business. Even Julia Gillard has been implicated in that crime but denies any wrongdoing ofcourse.

Next we have the HSU paying out hundreds of thousands of dollars to Thompson, a member of parliament and a former Union member. Money that he wasted by paying for prostitutes and every else besides HSU business also the head of the Union fisking the Union for millions is spare cash. Again, we have that just swept under the carpet and we are still waiting for those lazy public servants to get off their arse and actually perform their duty. Should hear more about that thievery later on as they are presumably digging, but we again wait.

From the AWU to the HSU, millions of dollars of unions members funds have been stolen. There have been no prosecutions, no Royal Commissions, and with the AWU - the media has been gagged. Now Michael Smith - a commentator courageous enough to put his job on the line - has been interviewed by CANdo, uncovering the scandal which has engulfed the trade union movement in Australia.

Paul Krugman, Another New York Time pretend Journalist.

Kruger, another overinflated left wing NYT pretender.

If anyone were to ask any left wing loony what one plus one would equal, they would have to have a committee meeting to decide how they would go about lying to giving five for an answer. So dishonest are those individuals that every thing that comes out of their mouths would first have to be admitted to a bullshit detector. Speaking of lunatics, have a look at those rampant clowns declaring that we are all going to fry for Christmas and they are not referring to the turkey.

Paul Krugman is another member of the left wing/socialist/communist scribblers at the New York(Pravda) Times Central Committee. Another scribbler who is of the opinion that his version of the truth would not be checked or even commented on. They honestly believe that the plebes and minions are way too stupid to discover anything that obvious. This comes about becuase Kruger thinks the sun dawns when he arises and the Earth rotates around this miserble lying excuse of a human being. One wonders if they do attend a special course in "How to Lie and pretend you're always correct". They all seem to be of that same arrogant ilk.

The Internet has done wonders exposing these trash inducing journalists and exposing them for what they are all about.

Professor Bjorn Lomborg fact checks warming alarmist Paul Krugman:

Consider Paul Krugman, writing breathlessly in The New York Times about the “rising incidence of extreme events” and how ”large-scale damage from climate change is happening now”.

He claims that global warming caused the current drought in the US midwest and that supposedly record-high corn prices could cause a global food crisis.

But the UN climate panel’s latest assessment tells us precisely the opposite: for “North America, there is medium confidence that there has been an overall slight tendency toward less dryness (wetting trend with more soil moisture and runoff)”.

Moreover, there is no way Krugman could have identified this drought as being caused by global warming without a time machine: climate models estimate that such detection will be possible by 2048, at the earliest.

And, fortunately, this year’s drought appears unlikely to cause a food crisis. According to The Economist, “price increases in corn and soybeans are not thought likely to trigger a food crisis, as they did in 2007-08, as global rice and wheat supplies remain plentiful”.

Moreover, Krugman overlooks inflation: prices have increased sixfold since 1969 so, while corn futures did set a record of about $US8 ($7.60) a bushel last month, the inflation-adjusted price of corn was higher throughout most of the 1970s, reaching a whopping $US16 in 1974.

Finally, Krugman conveniently forgets that concerns about global warming are the main reason that corn prices have skyrocketed since 2005. Nowadays 40 per cent of corn grown in the US is used to produce ethanol, which does absolutely nothing for the climate but certainly distorts the price of corn at the expense of many of the world’s poorest people.

(Subscription required.)
UPDATE

It takes meteorologist Professor Roger Pielke Jr a single graph to demonstrate Krugman is a Nobel idiot.
But Melbourne’s Greens swallow Krugman’s rubbish gladly

Step Up for the $ 65,000, Kim Kardashian Model.

The 65,000 dollar question, does the facade cover what's inside ?

I have often wondered what the treatments were that females like Kardashian Kim went through to keep the skin, hair and other wobbly bits under control and looking their best. Just in case you were wondering what it costs to have some exceptional arm candy. Here is the cost of running Kim on a normal day to day operation. A bit like keeping machinery in top condition but it definitely would not cost this much. Keeping a Lamborghini in top condition would be cheaper, with less arguments, hissy fits and (I have a headache) downtime.

I think I prefer the Lambo.

AND HERE'S HOW KIM LOOKS LIKE KIM KARDASHIAN ...

FACE

Fortnightly £800 facials at Beverly Hills salon Bailey's as well as a monthly 24-carat gold UMO facial and twice weekly anti-ageing glycolic face peels.

Kim is a huge fan of permanent eyelash extensions and has a weekly appointment to fix any strays and keep them topped up.

Regular blasts of Fraxel cosmetic laser treatment, costing up to £2000 a time keep her complexion peachy

BODY

Twice monthly spa days at the five star Four Seasons hotel keep Kim's body in top condition. Her favourite treatments include £110 body scrubs made with tequila, tangerine and sunflower oil.

She has admitted to having laser cellulite removal on various parts of her body.

Two detoxifying mud wraps per month keep her skin flawless.

Kim spends a hour a day on either a massage, skin and nail treatments. A nail session at Bevery Hills Nail Design sets her back £95 a time.

HAIR

The brunette goes to celebrity stylist Philip Wolff at the Shades salon in Beverly Hills for £500 styling sessions to keep her sew-in weft extensions in tip top condition.

Kim also treats them at home with an hour long treatment.

FITNESS

The size 10 star works out every day with celebrity trainer Gunnar Peterson who says:

‘Kim is an incredibly hard worker. She comes right from the airport to the gym and is no stranger to 6am workouts.’

FOOD

As well as the 'sex diet' that she credits with help her losing seven pounds in seven days recently, Kim cuts out gluten, dairy and sugar from her diet and has all her food delivered in special freezer bags ready to refrigerate

That's not all folks. Looks like Kim got to be the Paris Hilton's replacement for attention as the media always needs someone to be in that position ofcourse. It fill gaps.

According to Heat magazine the star splashes out on £5,500 of treatments every month, spending over 180 hours beautifying herself.

24-carat gold facials, tequila body scrubs and weekly eyelash appointments are the norm for the 31-year-old, and she also recently admitted to chat show host Oprah that she has had 'everything lasered’

 The cost for all this vanity and money making effort is -

Price of being Kim revealed as over £65,000 per year in beauty treatments alone

Not a bad return when you can suck in a guy into marriage for 72 days just to get additional exposure and then move onto the next one as women do, without blinking an eyelid.

Women Vote for their Own Benefits, Not the Countries Best Interest.

It has always been a fact that women will vote for the "cutest" politician as they did for Bill "I did not sh*g that woman" Clinton. He is most probably one of the best examples as the clones lined up to vote for the hypocrite and liar. Obama is ofcourse another fine example on women loosing their common sense and what the countries needs, as they stick with the "What's in it for ME" mentality. It truly is a sad indictment where females will always predominantly vote for socialism as they know they will get all those extra and additional benefits on top of the myriads they already have.

This blatant and obvious selfishness is there for all to see as we show the current voting and the non-thinking of the selfish sex. It has always been the "ME" mentality and solely in it for what they can get. It's sickening. Maybe for once they could actually take some interest in the policies and what those politicains stand for instead of looking at whether or not they would like to jump into the sheets with them.

The Sad Truth about the 2012 Women's Vote.

It's time for some honest talk. It's not always pleasant and it's not always easy to hear, but it certainly beats talking points and trying to twist a narrative into a convenient pretzel.
You can't change reality until you face reality.
An August 7-8 CNN/ORC poll found that women today would vote for Obama (53%) over Romney (44%) if the election were held now. According to the same poll, 51% of women approve of President Obama's job performance (46% disapprove) and 48% of women believe the country would be better off if Democrats controlled Congress (39% believe we'd be better off if Republicans were in control). Fifty-eight percent of women hold a favorable opinion of Obama (40% unfavorable), while 49% of women have a favorable opinion of Romney (46% unfavorable).
Hold onto those stats for a moment.
On August 13, The Wall Street Journal disclosed that "The latest Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll showed that President Obama leads Mr. Romney 54% to 39% among women. The gap gets truly staggering when it comes to college-educated women. Here, Mr. Obama leads 63%-32%."
I'm going to be blunt with you. The GOP has a very big problem when it comes to female voters. It has for a long time, and I'm concerned about both the ability to reverse it and what it says about the majority of women at this time in history.
In June, CNSNews.com revealed that "The number of American women who are unemployed was 766,000 individuals greater in May 2012 than in January 2009, when President Barack Obama took office, according to data released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics."
Women have been hit hard by Obama's policies. They have struggled to find jobs. In many families, they are the household leaders writing the checks, balancing the checkbooks, and watching their household debt climb with each passing day.
And yet it hasn't changed their allegiance to a party--and a president--whose policies have helped place them in that sea of frustration.
Female business owners are already being crippled by ObamaCare's tax hikes and the overall regulatory burden. They watched our president tell them "You didn't build that" after those women invested years of time, creativity, and money into making their visions a reality.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/08/15/sad-truth-about-2012-women-vote/#ixzz23fUy2lZm

Joe Biden, Dumber than a Brick.

Joe Biden, his claim to fame is err...err..err..still waiting.

One would have imagined that anyone lobbed into the position of vice president would at least have two functioning brain cells to rub together. It would appear that Obama assumed he will live forever as he has obviously not given any thought at what a disaster Biden would be if he ever took over the country.

Enter Paul Ryan, sharp, intelligent, concise and obviously a thinker. One who would be quite capable of running the country which is more than we can say about the permanent accident prone and basically stupid, Biden. Every time he opens his mouth, out comes some inane and incomprehensible rubbish and he has to explain further what it was he actually "meant". Not the actions of a sane human being and a functioning mind, would you agree. That to me appears to be a fair observation.

Biden reminds me of that song and album by Jethro Tull "Thick as a brick".

Here is some examples of this drone's rantings -

Joe Biden still trying to form a comprehensive sentence.

They were right, and Powerline’s John Hinderaker now asks:

Is Joe Biden Too Dumb To Be On a National Ticket?

Funny how so much of the media so horrified that Palin might be dumb seems not to care that Biden really is:

As you have probably heard, Joe Biden did it again today: he forgot what century we are living in. This follows a bad day yesterday, when Biden forgot what state he was in, and then told a Virginia audience that the Republicans are “going to put y’all back in chains.” Oh, today Biden also referred to Paul Ryan as “Governor Ryan.”

Such blunders are conventionally referred to as gaffes, but with Biden they come so fast and furiously that one wonders whether something else is at work. Rudy Giuliani finally said yesterday what many have thought for a long time:

I think the vice president of the United States has become a laugh line on late night television. I mean, he — I’ve never seen a vice president that has made as many mistakes, said as many stupid things. I mean, there’s a real fear if, God forbid, he ever had to be entrusted with the presidency, whether he really has the mental capacity to handle it. I mean, this guy just isn’t bright. He’s never been bright. He isn’t bright. And people think, “Well, he just talks a little too much.” Actually he’s just not very smart.

But “not very smart” doesn’t fully capture Biden’s incapacity either. Biden is a blowhard, but one who often displays a shocking lack of knowledge.

NewsBusted, waxing lyrical on misinformation.

The occasional giggle is good and what a better way of having a laugh than at the hypocrisy and blatant obvious mis-truthes, un-truthes, half-truthes and the blatant obvious lies that the Obama Campaign and it's minions come up with.

Does Biden EVER do Anything Right?

Yep, Biden's speciality - Face pulling and imitating a sign language lady. Just brilliant. Next, he'll remember his tie.

When one compares the current pretend vice presidential disaster that is Biden, one who would have a major issue trying to join two sentences together. One has to wonder what desperations the Obama administration is now going through knowing that the drone Biden, will have to debate Ryan on National television.

'THEY GONNA PUT Y'ALL BACK IN CHAINS'...

Team Obama confident Biden can take on Ryan...

VIDEO: Biden Imitates Sign Language Lady...

Does Biden ever do anything right, One has to wonder.

Bill Bennett suggested on his radio show this morning that the Romney-Ryan campaign (or someone else) cut an ad to make famous these remarks (delivered a year ago at the University of North Carolina) about Paul Ryan by Clinton White House chief of staff Erskine Bowles:

“Have any of you all met Paul Ryan? We should get him to come to the university. I’m telling you this guy is amazing. ... He is honest, he is straightforward, he is sincere. And the budget that he came forward with is just like Paul Ryan. It is a sensible, straightforward, serious budget and it cut the budget deficit just like we did, by $4 trillion. … The president as you remember, came out with a budget and I don’t think anybody took that budget very seriously. The Senate voted against it 97 to nothing."